How to easily start up and market your own
profitable photography business

Canon ET67 Lens Hood for Canon EF 100mm

by admin · 15 comments

in Cables,Lenses

Brand: Canon
Average Rating
15 reviews

Hoods are one of the most important accessories for each lens you own. A lens hood provides multiple functions: it shades the lens from stray light, improving your contrast and image quality; in inclement weather, it can assist in keeping moisture or wind-blown debris off the lens; and it protects the front barrel from the inevitable impacts against walls, door frames, and other real-life obstacles.This hood is compatible with EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM. more info

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Related Products

{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }

Ms. Jessica Cheng January 3, 2010 at 2:44 pm

Well, my Macro Lens needs it!!
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
It’s too $$$$ for a little black plastic, but I need it for my lens.

Paulo Martel January 6, 2010 at 4:55 am

Too expensive
Rating:1 out of 5 stars
This lens hood is a must if you are serious about macro photography with you 100mm f/2.8. I cannot praise the lens high enough, but that is no reason why Canon should rip us off, asking $40 for a piece of cheap plastic!! Why don’t they follow Nikon’s example and start shipping their lenses with hoods. After all, good and pricey lenses are for people who are serious about photography, and people who are serious about photography want to have hoods on their lenses!! So Canon, stop being greedy…

I give it a rating of 1/5 simply because the quality/price ratio is terrible.

G2 in Gillett PA January 15, 2010 at 3:45 pm

Hood, yea, it’s a hood :-)
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
A bit pricey but not Amazon’s fault, but

it serves it’s purpose quite well in keeping

extraneous light out of the lens, and it

does slip onto the lens in reverse for

easy carry, Amazon shipped quickly and packaged

it well for the trip.

G2

Priya Srinivasan February 3, 2010 at 4:54 pm

Good product
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Canon ET67 Lens Hood for Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Lens

Nice hood for my macro lens. Helps me get great macro shots.

pebblepuppy February 8, 2010 at 6:40 am

a good hood
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
It fits like a glove. It’s pretty big though. The inside is a little fuzzy and attracts dust, but at least it’s there and not on my lens. I usually keep my 100mm lens on my Canon Rebel, but it won’t fit in my bag with the hood on. Instead of reversing it, I found the hood fits nicely in my camera bag if I slip it down over my 50mm lens (with it’s hood on) in the side pocket. It works to protect the 50 and rides well there.

Stefan February 10, 2010 at 1:15 am

Good but too expensive
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
The lens hood fits very well and seems to be reasonably sturdy. However in my opinion it is simply overprized.

billsirinek February 18, 2010 at 5:02 pm

expensive but a fine product
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Yes, the lens hood is pretty expensive for what it is, you have to take in account a few things:

1) You’ll take better pictures with it than without it, especially in a bright lightbox or sunny day. I’ve bought hoods for all my lenses now.

2) Its about the same price as a good-quality UV filter you would use on your lens to protect it while not degrading image quality (ie: not the $10 tiffen filter Amazon is hawking on this page). I personally use both the hood and a B&W UV filter.

3) The lens is almost $500 as it is. $40 isnt the end of the world, especially when you consider what the next step up for Canon macros costs.

4) The lens hood makes the lens look pretty impressive, adding 3-4″ to the length. Yes, that’s just my opinion, but felt I would share it. ;-)

Anyway, Genuine Canon products are usually pretty pricy, but given the poor-quality third party knockoffs I’ve tried (shutter release cables, etc) its worth it to just spend the extra money.

R. Daniel February 21, 2010 at 2:01 am

Macro lens Hood
Rating:3 out of 5 stars
It’s the perfect addition to my macro. It offers great protection and shade and versitality to the macro lens.

Dee H. March 14, 2010 at 8:05 pm

a must have accessory
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
this lens hood is a must have for your lens…it keeps out the unwanted light, the dust and elements for your shoot, it also protects the lens in the same manner….

Michael D. Newcomer April 1, 2010 at 10:55 pm

Expensive, but a Must Have for I.Q.
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
First of all, I think if you spend this kind of money for the lens, it should some with a lens hood. I guess I’ll never understand why Canon is so stingy in this regard.

The hood works as described, exterior plastic does scratch easily (like all Canon lens hoods) and, as another reviewer pointed out, you have to remove the lens cap before putting on the lens hood. Also, I wish there were a way to use the hood in conjunction with the MR-14EX ringlight flash, but it’s one or the other.

When I first got the lens, I tried to do without the hood, but was losing some contrast and getting some interference from other light sources, the hood fixed that.

Rugersix April 20, 2010 at 7:47 am

Overpriced, but genuine Canon build
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
Should have come with the lens, but then, the lens would simply have had a higher price, right?

Chris A. Epler April 23, 2010 at 4:11 pm

An overpriced piece of plastic.
Rating:3 out of 5 stars
Lets face it, it’s a $35 piece of plastic. It fits the 100mm f/2.8 macro lens. If you want a hood for this lens, this is the one you need. But at $35, it’s WAY overpriced.

Francisco PENA April 25, 2010 at 11:54 pm

Expensive for what it is but it does the job
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
I bought this product just because I want all my equipment to be canon, so I don’t believe there is much difference among this product and the ones produced by non-canon companies. (4 stars because the price)

regards,

Edmund M. Oppenheimer June 14, 2010 at 12:59 am

Essential In Spite Of Price
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
The Canon ET67 Lens Hood has actually surpassed my expectations for quality and utility, so much so that I don’t mind the price as much as I originally did.

In my view, it is a better way to protect the lens from dirt and damage than a skylight filter. It will protect the lens thread better than a skylight filter in most cases, if the camera is dropped. It affords very effective protection from dirt, smudging, and scratching. It doesn’t need to be cleaned, as a filter does. And the improvement in exposure quality that results from shielding a lens from stray ambient light and reflection is underestimated.

If you don’t need to use more than one filter on your EF 100mm f2.8 Macro USM Lens and you take pictures outdoors, then the ET67 is an essential accessory.

L. Lim June 27, 2010 at 8:30 am

Useful, but expensive
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
In addition to shading the lens from glare and preventing lens flare in your photos, a lens hood can also help protect the front element of your lens without degrading image quality (like a cheap UV filter, for example). When using on board or hot shoe flash, it may end up shading your subject from the flash.

After seeing the lens hood that came with my 24-105L, and comparing it to the one on my Tamron, I decided to go ahead, sacrifice a few lunches out, and get Canon hoods for my two other lenses. Sure, they’re overpriced, but the 3rd party ones are overpriced as well even at half this price on eBay, and at least I know this one fits well.

I removed one star for the price. Otherwise it’s perfect.

Pros:

Fits very well.

Inside is lined with a velvety material that will not reflect light.

Can be reverse mounted on 100mm macro for storage.

Cons:

Price.

Velvety material traps dust and dirt.

Needs to be removed to replace / remove lens cap (not really an issue with the hood – just need to get into the habit of removing cap before putting hood on).

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code:

Previous post:

Next post: